Imran Khan's Transfer to Adiala Jail: Legal Proceedings and Implications

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader Imran Khan, who was sentenced to three years in jail in the Toshakhana case, has been shifted to Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail. Asad Warraich, administrator of Adiala Jail, confirmed Dawn.com that the former army chief had reached the jail. He said the security of Adiala jail has been fixed.

The court further said that Imran Khan will be given offices as per the jail manual. Meanwhile, in a post via web-based entertainment Stage X, PTI posted a video showing party allies showering flower petals on a police convoy carrying Imran Khan near the Islamabad Coast Court.

The improvement came a day after the Islamabad High Court (IHC) heard petitions seeking transfer of Imran Khan to Rawalpindi, saying that under-elementary prisoners (UTPs) of relative courts in the state capital were kept in Adiala jail and the PTI chief was given a bearing to shift him to the jail.

Recently, the court gave its framed judgment on Imran's plea to transfer him to Rawalpindi's Adiala Jail, making a similar request and preserving all previous warnings and orders under which he was confined in Attock Jail.

The request, a duplicate of which is accessible with Dawn.com, expressed that the ongoing status of the candidate was an under-preliminary detainee. Taking note of that Islamabad didn't have its very own jail, it said that all such detainees confronting cases in the capital were to be kept at the Adiala Prison.

"To say that it (Adiala Prison) can't house another detainee/individual, wouldn't mirror the right position," the request expressed.

It further said, "There isn't anything on record to prove the supplication of the respondents with respect to security concerns or absence of sufficient security at the Focal Prison Adyala, Rawalpindi."

On the question of prison offices gave to the previous chief, it noticed: "He (Imran) will be qualified for every one of the offices which are stood to a superior class detainee."

Concerning demand made a day prior that the PTI boss be furnished with an "practice machine", the IHC said it couldn't issue such headings and regardless of whether it was reasonable, and coordinated Imran to record an application for it before the Attock prison director.

In the mean time, the IHC likewise gave the composed decision on Imran's supplication against the Government Examination Organization's solicitation for in-camera procedures of the PTI chairman bail request under the watchful eye of the great court.

In it, the IHC noticed that the candidate's advice had presented that he had "no protest assuming superfluous individuals are prohibited" from the consultation.

Expressing that Segment 14 of the Offical Privileged insights Act 1923 allowed the "prohibition of public from the procedures", the IHC said it expected that the indictment document an application for it.

"On the off chance that, the arraignment is intrigued that general society be rejected from the procedures of moment case, it might move a proper application for this sake," it noticed.

Post a Comment

0 Comments